2-Step, 1-Step or Instant: which one suits you

All three routes end in the same place: a funded account, a 95% profit split and the same payout cycle. What separates them is how much you demonstrate up front, and what you give up to skip it.

2-Step

Two evaluation phases, each with its own profit target, the second lower than the first. It is the cheapest way in and the most forgiving pace, because the targets are split across two stages rather than stacked into one. The trade-off is time: there are two phases to clear before anything is funded.

Choose it if you are confident in your approach but would rather not be forced into a hurry.

1-Step

One phase, one target, and a slightly wider daily allowance than the 2-Step carries. Fewer stages means a shorter road to a funded account, and it costs a little more for that.

Choose it if your strategy produces results in a reasonably short window and you do not want a second phase waiting after you clear the first.

Instant

No evaluation at all. The account is funded from the start and you can take a payout under the normal cycle without passing anything first. Two things pay for that: the leverage is 1:50 rather than 1:100, and the maximum loss is tighter than on the evaluated models.

Choose it if you would rather trade real conditions immediately than spend weeks proving a point you are already sure of — and if your approach does not lean on the higher leverage.

What is identical across all three

• A flat 95% profit split.
• MetaTrader 5, with accounts issued by an administrator once your order is paid.
• A static maximum loss measured from your starting balance, so profit genuinely buys you room.
• The same prohibited activities and the same payout rules.

Prices for every account size are on the Pricing page, and the exact targets, allowances and minimum trading days for each model are on Trading Rules. Both pages are generated from the plans themselves, so they carry the figures your account will actually be judged against.